Articles and Links: Library of Intellectual Development

Lady DaVinci Home

About Lady DaVinci's Salon

Contact Lady DaVinci

 

Site Updated : 3 April, 2008

Artist Karl Bruloff
Mother Awoken by Her Crying Child, by Karl Brulloff. (1831). Sepia. Courtesy Olga's Gallery.

The Libraries

 Of Interest~

Lady DaVinci's World MarketFocus on ExcellenceFocus on WineFocus on FoodQuotations

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Neuroscience of Motherhood

by Gina Stepp

Forget the “decade of the brain” (that old nineties phraseology): it’s becoming evident that we’re probably not going to get over our fascination with neuroscience anytime this century. The fact is, as a result of today’s neurobiological revolution, nothing is what it used to be. And that includes motherhood. The Hallmark Corporation doesn’t seem to have caught on to this yet, but the reasons for celebrating Mother’s Day are changing yet again.

America’s holiday for mothers began as a formal acknowledgement of the fact that so many women were unselfishly dedicated to helping those in the community less fortunate than themselves. The work clubs pioneered by Ann Reeves Jarvis serve as a prime example of this kind of aspiration.

Somewhere along the line, however, the focus of Mother’s Day moved closer to the center of a mother’s sphere of influence, toward what she does within her household for her own family. While these contributions are considerable and indispensable, in some ways perhaps such an inward focus narrows our sphere. Thankfully, however, neuroscientists may have uncovered just the research to distract us from obsessing about our own sacrifices long enough to consider some of the things families actually do for mothers: to be more specific, what children do for mothers.

In this vein Katherine Ellison, author of The Mommy Brain: How Motherhood Makes Us Smarter (2005), brought welcome news to mothers everywhere. It’s true, she acknowledges: we mothers have long perpetuated the notion that having babies zaps our brain cells.  This notion finally became so entrenched, she says, that dozens of scientists set out to discover whether it is actually true. And the truth is? It is not.

In fact, she found, study after study shows that having babies contributes to increased brain cells and along with these little darlings (the new brain cells as well as the babies) come increased skills of all kinds. 

At the center of this good news is that now-familiar phenomenon, neurogenesis: the brain’s process of growing and changing through the development of new neurons. This amazing brain plasticity is encouraged by repeated new actions, especially of the “positive, emotionally charged, and challenging” variety, referred to by scientists as “enrichment.” As it turns out, the process of childrearing, beginning even in pregnancy, is enrichment’s mother lode. The rich variety of intense new experiences forced on us mothers by daily interaction with our children strengthens much more than our flexibility and our multitasking skills. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) reveals increases in a long list of areas, including (but not limited to) emotional intelligence, sensory powers, mental perception, motivation, attention, problem solving, prioritizing, memory and learning. And the gains are not temporary. In fact, indications are that the positive changes brought about in the brain by pregnancy hormones and subsequent stimulation from our babies and children last for the rest of our lives—long past the time our grandchildren are born.

So why have women almost universally embraced the idea that pregnancy and childbirth turn their brains to Jell-O? Sleep deprivation certainly plays a role, but Ellison again marshals a long list of neuroscientists whose findings add other crucial pieces to the puzzle. “What’s really going on,” she translates, is that “a pregnant and early postpartum woman’s brain is tied up in a major, hormone-powered transition.” In other words, our bodies have just served us a powerful hormonal cocktail which is designed to prepare our brains for unprecedented growth and reorganization. “Motherhood,” says Ellison, “just like puberty, may knock us off our feet for a time, only to set us back up, often stronger than before.” Comparing the forgetfulness of pregnant mothers to Einstein’s famous distractedness, Ellison is nevertheless careful to qualify the analogy: “Encouraging as this paradigm may be . . . it’s important to remember that new mothers are coping with some serious physical challenges that Albert Einstein could barely have imagined.”

Despite the role of pregnancy-induced hormones in this brain-enriching experience, the good news is not only for mothers. Research is hinting that the benefits of childcare may turn out to be a “father lode” as well.

“If research on mice has any bearing on humans,” says Ellison, “modern, engaged dads may be gaining some of the same learning and memory advantages from parenthood as have been found in maternal rats. The key appears to be the degree of involvement with the children.” Further, Ellison notes the documented rise of certain “parenting” hormones in men when their wives are pregnant, and points to the well-known phenomenon called Couvades syndrome, in which “sympathy morning sickness” and “sympathy weight gain” are factors. 

But are these pre-baby changes only “sympathetic” in fathers? A 2006 study by neuroscientists at the University of Wisconsin–Madison suggests that something physiological is actually occurring. In the first nonhuman primate study into this phenomenon, researchers concluded: “It is clear that expectant fathers of these [primate] species are physiologically responsive to their mate’s pregnancy and the impending birth. Males need to be prepared to engage in infant care immediately after birth and this requires carrying multiple infants weighing up to 20 percent of their adult body weight. Both the hormonal and the physical weight change suggest that marmoset and tamarin males prepare for the demands of infant care.” 

If, as scientists speculate, these physiological changes are brought about by the exchange of pheromones between pregnant mothers and fathers, it may be one more benefit to be gained from the cultivation of close family relationships. 

While adoptive parents and other caregivers also reap some of the brain-boosting benefits of child-rearing and also experience some physiological changes, “there is no denying,” says Ellison, “that the nine-month preparation of pregnancy and the experience of delivering a child give biological mothers an advantage in making what’s usually a life-long commitment.”

Ellison’s thoughtful collection of research certainly dispatches the sometimes popular notion that raising a child is “less worthy” work for thinking, intelligent people. In fact, it’s beginning to look like one of the best avenues for becoming a thinking, intelligent human being.

Perhaps motherhood, after all, is its own reward.

 

 

SELECTED REFERENCES:
1John Fauber, Animal Studies Show Fathers Mimic Pregnancy SymptomsJSONLINE (Feb 3, 2006). 2Craig Howard Kinsley and Kelly G. Lambert, The Maternal BrainScientific American (January 2006). 3Mary S. MacDonald Pavelka, Linda M. Fedigan and Sandra Zohar, Availability and Adaptive Value of Reproductive and Postreproductive Japanese Macaque Mothers and Grandmothers, Animal Behaviour, (2002). 4University of British Columbia Press Release: UBC Study Gives Insight Into How First Time Mothers May Experience Enhanced Learning and Memory. (June 6, 2006).

First published in Vision Journal

11 May, 2007

 

 

 

More Articles by this Author

  

Lady DaVinci's Weblog, La Tavola Calda



Katherine Ellison:
Katherine Ellison
Author of
The Mommy Brain: How Motherhood Makes Us Smarter